Hurricane Sandy certainly puts the tedious political circus in
perspective, with the storm's tremendous threat to life and property up and
down the coast. It is sobering. I've
written many times about our boating life in Norwalk, Ct, and how that area has
a special place in our hearts, even though we are in Florida most of the
time. I think of what our friends are
going through right now, back in our old home environs, and it is frightening
and potentially catastrophic. And our boat,
Swept Away, is at risk there. Although
up on the hard, it is in danger of floating away in any significant tidal
surge, finally coming to rest wherever the water and wind takes her, certainly
with damage, maybe total destruction.
They say that's what insurance is for, but that is not the point as it is
more of a home to us and we have maintained it with a special devotion and
respect a classic boat deserves. Nonetheless
the fate of our boat is only a spec on
this developing landscape of horror from Sandy.
So many lives will be disrupted or endangered and we're hoping for the best for our boating
friends there, our boat club, and all impacted by this storm of the century.
Monday, October 29, 2012
Friday, October 26, 2012
Gorilla in the Room
Finally
it comes out, point blank. No mistake
about it, racism in the so called post-racist USA and its possible impact on
the election.
One
of Mitt Romney’s presidential campaign advisors, John Sununu, in an interview
on CNN when asked about Colin Powell’s endorsement of President Obama for a
second term, said, “Frankly, when you take a look at Colin Powell, you have to
wonder whether that’s an endorsement based on issues or whether he’s got a
slightly different reason for preferring President Obama.” When asked to
clarify what that issue might be he said “well, I think when you have somebody
of your own race that you’re proud of being president of the United States, I
applaud Colin for standing with him.”
Does
that mean Sununu supports Romney, not based on the issues, but because of race? It is not too farfetched to wonder why ”according to Reuters/Ipsos polling conducted October 1 to October 7, likely white male voters favored Romney 55.5 percent to 31.9 percent.”
An
earlier entry mentioned that I was reading the last of the “Schmidt trilogy” by
Louis Begley, the current one being Schmidt
Steps Back, published this year but probably written over the two prior
years. I think of Begley as being the intellectual
equivalent of John Updike, who coincidently was Begley’s classmate at Harvard,
both graduating summa cum laude in 1954.
From there, their careers diverged, Updike becoming a writer and Begley
an international lawyer. But Begley is
now a full time writer, and to me, writes with the intellectual ease of his
classmate and, like Updike, follows a character in multiple novels over years
(Rabbit and Schmidt).
I
intend to some more on Begley when I finish the book, but I have to quote
something from Schmidt Steps Back which
has a direct bearing, on “the gorilla in the room.” One of the characters in the book, Mike Mansour, an ultra wealthy and powerful
international financier, gives voice to the issue (bear in mind, Begley does
not use quotation marks for dialogue in the novel, an idiosyncratic style I’ve
become accustomed to so the quotation marks here are mine): “Then Mr. Mansour took
over. He began to orate, his voice rising
as he expounded his theory, which in other versions he revealed to Schmidt more than once, to the
effect that Obama’s presidency, however much he personally wished it to
succeed, was doomed. The question is, he insisted, the question is can he make
American politicians do his will. The
last Democrat able to accomplish that was LBJ.
He’d grab them by the balls….—and they said, Yes Mr. President, before
he’d even begun to squeeze…But Obama is black!
Black in the most racist country in the world.” Another character reminds Mansour that Obama
was just elected by a landslide. “The question is, the great financier
continued, whether it knew what it was doing. I tell you that too many of those
who voted for him didn’t have a clear idea.
Now they’re saying the White House is going to be the Black House, and
they didn’t sign up for that….Obama has to be such a good guy that his hands
and feet are tied. You watched him
debate McCain?....You saw him smirk whenever Obama talked? Not once, not twice, but every time. LBJ would have said, Wipe that smirk off your
face or I’ll tear your head off. Barack
can’t do that. You can’t have a black
man telling off the Man. Please, there
is no place here for angry black men! Obama has to be polite and make nice, and
you know what they say about nice guys – they finish last.”
It will be a close election as the one in 2000 decided by the Supreme Court ....
Labels:
Colin Powell,
Election,
John McCain,
John Sununu,
John Updike,
LBJ,
Louis Begley,
Mitt Romney,
Obama
Hurricane Sandy
Although
we are some 250 miles from the storm, feeder bands come and go with hurricane
intensity such as this one, filmed from our porch. The water level is abnormally high almost
covering the dock. The large boat across
our waterway was leaning to the starboard in the northerly wind. Our Pursuit had been tied to our lift. One can imagine the impact of a direct hit,
winds of this magnitude for a sustained period.
Of course seven years ago we had Hurricane Wilma which, although it
approached from the west, actually strengthened as it passed over our home as a
Cat 2.
Wednesday, October 24, 2012
"So we beat on..."
No
comment on the following quotes which speak for themselves, individually and
collectively....
October 23, 2012
Richard Mourdock, Indiana Republican Senate candidate, in
a debate segment covering abortion, "I struggled with it myself for a long
time, but I came to realize that life is that gift from God. And, I think, even
when life begins in that horrible situation of rape, that it is something that
God intended to happened."
August 19, 2012
Rep. Todd Akin, Missouri Republican Senate candidate, in response to a question on whether a rape victim should have the option of abortion, "from what I understand from doctors, that's really rare. If it's a legitimate rape, the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down."
June 18, 2011
Gov. Mitt Romney. Republican Presidential candidate, in a Pro Life Pledge editorial, "I support the reversal of Roe v. Wade, because it
is bad law and bad medicine. Roe was a misguided ruling that was a result of a
small group of activist federal judges legislating from the bench....I will
only appoint judges who adhere to the Constitution and the laws as they are
written, not as they want them to be written."
Saturday, October 20, 2012
The Alternative Reality
It's easy to be cynical in this presidential election
year, the rhetoric and posturing of the scripted, agnotological "debates," the Super
PAC ads, the robo-calls, the deluge of direct mail, sending out those sound bites
to "the undecided." But what
would this election cycle be like if McCain had won in 2008? Ironically, it would have been the Democrats
finger pointing about the economy because we'd probably be in a similar
situation, or worse, who knows -- it's impossible to prove an alternative reality,
but we can speculate.
The debt Romney carps about was first ramped up by the
Treasury Department of the previous administration, not by Obama, with the
enactment of the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) in 2008 to stabilize the
financial system and it was quite necessary at the time. Jobs were falling off the cliff before Obama
took office. Our financial system was in melt down. And what would have been a McCain
administration response as that crisis just continued to deepen? Go into an austerity spending mode? Cut taxes?
No, that would have been impossible.
The time for government to reign in its spending is when the economy is NOT
falling off the cliff and even a Republican administration would have had to
take similar action (and the Federal Reserve's Ben Bernanke was an appointee of
the Republican administration as well).
Reviewing some of the more distant past, Clinton enacted
tax increases in 1994, mostly on high income earners. Eventually, those, as
well as a booming economy (note, no loss of jobs due to raising taxes on the upper
1%), turned around President George Bush Sr.'s deficits into surpluses. After
three consecutive years of national debt reduction under Clinton, the surplus
in 2000 amounted to $230 billion.
The first fiscal year impacted by George W. Bush's tax
cuts was 2002 when the surplus swung to a $159 billion deficit, a $286 billion negative
change from the previous year. True, we
were now embroiled in the war on terror, but the administration persisted on raising
the stakes with tax cuts. Bush said
while campaigning for a local Alabama congressman. “In order to make sure that our economy grows, in order to make sure
the job base is strong, you need to have a congressman who will join me in
making sure that tax relief plan we passed is permanent and doesn’t go away.”
Where were the jobs after nine years of
this "temporary" but massive tax cut, mostly benefiting the upper 1%?
When Paul O'Neill, Bush's Treasury Secretary, argued
against a second round of tax cuts, VP Cheney purportedly said "You know, Paul, Reagan proved that
deficits don't matter. We won the mid-term elections, this is our due."
This was Cheney speaking, not some
liberal Democrat. O'Neill said in an interview "It was not just about not wanting the tax cut. It was about how
to use the nation's resources to improve the condition of our society. And I
thought the weight of working on Social Security and fundamental tax reform was
a lot more important than a tax reduction." For that view, O'Neill was eventually fired.
Obama clearly underestimated how long it would take to
reverse years of deficit spending, not only his administration's (necessary as
the private sector was not spending), but his predecessor's as well. (He also
didn't anticipate being stonewalled by Congress.) But if McCain had defeated Obama in 2008, he
would have inherited the same mess and today we might have Hillary Clinton
running against McCain (or Palin or Romney) making some of the same arguments
about fiscal responsibility being spun by Romney.
As I said, it is hard not to be cynical about this
particular election, but I respect Paul O'Neill's admonishment: "It
was not just about not wanting the tax cut. It was about how to use the
nation's resources to improve the condition of our society." That
is why I support President Obama and hopefully in a second term he would have
Congress' cooperation to achieve some fundamental tax reform and make inroads
in controlling the growth of entitlements.
And last night, as I was preparing to post this, a bit of
serendipity led me to watch the 1957 classic A Face in the Crowd on Turner Classic Movies. Directed by Elia
Kazan and written by Budd Schulberg, it depicts Larry Rhodes (Andy Griffith), a
drifter who is found in a jail by Marcia Jeffries (Patricia Neal), who she
enlists to sing and talk on a local Arkansas radio station, he ultimately
rising to the pinnacle of media demagoguery.
He is nicknamed "Lonesome" Rhodes by Marcia, and she goes on
the journey with him from obscurity to fame to fall.
The relevancy of this film, made more than fifty years
ago, to today is striking. Lonesome is
drawn into the political arena, and is brought in to help transform the film's Senator
Worthington Fuller into a Presidential candidate. Lonesome instinctively and sardonically understands
the manipulative power of language and media.
When he first meets the Senator, he advises him to
abandon his stiff personality and give himself over to Lonesome's control: "...Your
problem is getting the voters to listen to you. Getting them to like you enough
to listen to you. We've got to face it, politics have entered a new stage,
television. Instead of long-winded debates, the people want slogans. 'Time for
a change' 'The mess in Washington' 'More bang for a buck'. Punch-lines and
glamour....We've got to find a million buyers for the product 'Worthington
Fuller'....Respect? Did you ever hear of anyone buying any product beer, hair
rinse, tissue, because they respect it? You've got to be loved, man. Loved....Senator,
I'm a professional. I look at the image on that screen same as at a performer
on my show. And I have to say...you'll never get over to my audience not to the
millions of people who welcome me into their living rooms each week. And if I
wouldn't buy him, do you realize what that means? If I wouldn't buy him, the
people of this country aren't ready to buy him for that big job on Pennsylvania
Avenue....I'm an influence, a wielder of opinion...a force. A force."
To Marcia he says :"This
whole country's just like my flock of sheep!....Rednecks, crackers,
hillbillies, hausfraus, shut-ins, pea-pickers - everybody that's got to jump
when somebody else blows the whistle. They don't know it yet, but they're all
gonna be 'Fighters for Fuller'. They're mine! I own 'em! They think like I do.
Only they're even more stupid than I am, so I gotta think for 'em. Marcia, you
just wait and see. I'm gonna be the power behind the president - and you'll be
the power behind me."
An actor on Rhodes' show asks him about Senator Fuller: "You really sell that stiff as a man among
men?" Lonesome Rhodes replies: "Those
morons out there? Shucks, I could take chicken fertilizer and sell it to them
as caviar. I could make them eat dog food and think it was steak. Sure, I got
'em like this... You know what the public's like? A cage of Guinea Pigs. Good
Night you stupid idiots. Good Night, you miserable slobs. They're a lot of
trained seals. I toss them a dead fish and they'll flap their flippers."
Thursday, October 11, 2012
Talley's Folly Successfully Opens Dramaworks' 2012/13 Season
Before last night's preview performance we attended Dramaworks'
traditional "Knowledge and Nibbles" session, lunch followed with an
opportunity to hear from the actors and the director and to have an exchange
with them concerning the performance. In
attendance, too, was the set designer, Michael Amico, as in a sense, the set
itself is the 3rd "character" in the play, always being referred to in
the script, as a place in time, a place in family history, and a symbol of the
emotional disarray of the play's two unlikely lovers.
The Victorian boat house in which the action takes place, the
folly of the play's title, where Sally Talley first met Matt Friedman a year
earlier, has been worn down by time, neglected, almost an outcast like the
characters themselves. Here Dramaworks take full advantage of its new expansive
stage, and the experienced Michael Amico, with the help of a book which had
actual plans for building a boathouse in 1870, strives to capture Lanford
Wilson's intent. Wilson's description states said that the boat house set
should not look "bombed out" but, instead, should look "run
down." Bombed out would imply
little hope, but hope gathers momentum as the play progresses. And so as we first see it, the boat house has
an almost ghoulish presence but becomes an enchanted place as the play unfolds.
It is July 4th in 1944, at Sally's home near Lebanon,
Missouri (incidentally, where the playwright was born) and the play begins with
an extraordinary monologue, Matt breaking the fourth wall, directly addressing
the audience, in fact, in this production, even strolling in the first row before
the stage, humorously and engagingly setting the time, place, and circumstances
of the play. He says the play "is a
waltz - a no-holds-barred romantic story that could be done here with a couple
of folding chairs, which, hopefully, will end in love, and that it will be
performed without an intermission." When Sally, the object of Matt's love, enters
the dialog abruptly shifts in a 90 minute plus performance, Matt now in full
character. It is an interesting dramatic
device, demanding your attention, and I thought one that endears the audience
to Matt's quest.
This is a prequel to Wilson's first play in the Talley series
of three, Fifth of July, which takes
place in 1977. In this, really the first
play chronologically, Wilson establishes how Sally and Matt meet only a month
after D Day, the implications of the war hanging heavily.
They first had a romance a year before, in this same boat house
which has been in Sally's family since her "Uncle Whistler" built it.
Everett Talley (known as the "whistler"
as he always whistled; everyone in the town thinking him crazy) wanted to build
a gazebo, but it became more of a boat
house. It has always been Sally's favorite place and she thinks of her Uncle as
one of the healthiest family members in spite of his eccentricities.
Her family is one of the two wealthiest families in
town. They are also Protestant and along
with that distinction comes some southern bigotry and Matt being a Jewish
immigrant and much older, is rendered unwelcome by them. (While Sally says
she’s a mid-westerner, Matt contends that "anyplace outside of New York
City and some suburbs of Boston, is the south!") Her family even threatens
to shoot him, calling Matt the ‘‘communist traitor infidel’’
Thus the clandestine meeting of Sally and Matt on this July
night in the boat house. Even though she at first rejects Matt's advances, in
fact telling him to go back to St. Louis, her very presence, and in a new dress
no less, sort of belies her protestations.
(Matt, by the way, is wearing a new tie instead of the same one he has
worn for years in his office.) Matt has
sent Sally letters for the past year, all unanswered (she complains that they
were mostly details about his work as an accountant).
So during that night they exchange stories about their
past. In spite of being from a
well-established family, Sally feels she is an outsider, carrying a secret with
her which she finally reveals to Matt (no spoiler here, see the play!). Once she unburdens herself of that, the walls
of Matt's unrequited love are torn down.
Sally questions Matt about his origins and Matt too has his
tale to tell, piecing together his Eastern European / German heritage, and
revealing a tragic family history of escaping persecution and the pain of his
family being killed by the Nazis.
It is a beautiful play of how two emotionally wounded
people, ones who feel out of step with the times and society, find a path to
happiness. "You and me are so alike, although we are so different" Sally
finally says. (And a political awakening has already stirred in Sally, her
being fired for teaching Thorstein Veblen's
Theory of the Leisure Class, in nursery school!)
So much of the play depends on the staging and the acting. As
a "two handed" play, only two people to keep the action moving
forward, it is such a delicate balance that at any time one fears their
relationship might spin out of control and end badly. And in this respect, Director J. Barry Lewis perfectly
choreographs the actors on the multi-tiered stage in harmony with the overall
feeling of the play as a waltz, the dialogue shifting back and forth between confrontation
and tenderness in 3/4 time! He also
finds the right symmetry between the play's humorous and soulful moments.
But when it comes right down to it, the acting makes or
breaks Talley's Folly and here
Dramaworks' casting excels. My wife,
Ann, saw Judd Hirsch's performance as Matt in the 1980 award-winning Broadway
production, but thought Brian Wallace's performance last night was every bit as
credible. Brian has to carry some heavy
lifting particularly with the opening monologue, and even though this was a
preview performance, the first time the actors have played the role in front of
a live audience, Mr. Wallace, making his first Dramaworks appearance (although
an experienced actor in NY and in repertory productions), carried the role as if
he's been performing it for months. He
had the audience rooting for him right from the beginning and his ease in
handling the diverse emotions of humor, anger, and disappointment, while practically
pleading for Sally's hand, were moving.
Erin Joy Schmidt who plays Sally has appeared in two other
productions we've seen, Goldie, Max and
Milk at the Florida Stage and Dinner
With Friends at Dramaworks. She can
turn an emotion on a dime, her eyes often welling up with tears while Matt is
speaking and even though she might be on another part of the stage, the
audience knew precisely when to follow her reaction. How does one play the part of a spinster, one
who by her own admission regarding her family "are as anxious to get rid
of me as I am to leave," but finds her opportunity to be a Jewish
accountant of foreign ancestry, and an older man of whom her family disapproves? She's afraid of intimacy and commitment on
the one hand and abandonment on the other, and Ms. Schmidt's performance covers
the whole range.
Mr. Wallace and Ms. Schmidt are the perfect duo playing the
roles of Matt and Sally, interacting with each other with ease.
A special note about the lighting, designed by Ron Burns as
at one point Matt remarks that there is "no color in the moonlight." It drew my attention to the dappled lighting as
if streaking through the trees across the actor's faces, just the perfect ambiance
for the play and the setting. Costume design is by Brian O’Keefe, with unerring
detail right down to Sally's seamed stockings. (Ann remarked how stunningly coifed Erin was
for the part, revealing earlier in the day that it took her over an hour and
half to perfect the period hairstyle!)
Perhaps some changes will be made between the preview and
the opening tomorrow, but to me, the play seems ready for prime time and a fitting
production for the first of Dramaworks' new season.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)