2025: Year of The ‘Imperial Me’

 

Peter Sellers as The Imperial Me

I’ve written several “New Year” entries, some hopeful, some less so, such as this one after the Trump-inspired violence and invasion of the Capitol on Jan. 6,2021.

 

Also, this is not the first time I found a profoundly eerie prescient message in an old movie such as the dialogue from the 1957 film A Face in the Crowd , written by Budd Schulberg and Directed by Elia Kazan, about the power of a megalomaniac. There are parallels to Trump’s first run at the White House.

 

On Christmas Eve Turner Classic Movies carried Carol for Another Christmas, Ron Serling’s warning to the world about the consequences of a nuclear holocaust modeled after the Dickens’ Christmas classic.  

 

While Serling’s 1964 TV movie is focused on the doomsday clock, a portion of the film directly relates to where we seem to be going in a 2^nd Trump administration: controlling the masses for the benefit of a few while abandoning decency and honor and lawfulness.  It is also ironic that the main character in the film is named “Grudge” as grudge seems to be a motivating factor in Trump’s Cabinet choices, all seemingly designed to destabilize societal norms.

 

The film portrays a wealthy industrialist, Daniel Grudge (Sterling Hayden), who like Scrooge, needs a lesson in ignoring the needs of mankind. As Wikipedia details,  Grudge emerges into destroyed ruins that he recognizes as having been his local town hall, where he encounters the Ghost of Christmas Future (Shaw). This Ghost explains that the town hall was wrecked in a disastrous nuclear conflict that killed most of the world's people. A handful of survivors enter, led by a demagogue called "Imperial Me" (Sellers) who wears a Santa suit and a cowboy hat cut into a crown. The crowd cheers as Imperial Me is paraded in and gives a speech exhorting each person to act as an individual in their own self-interest. Grudge watches his butler, Charles (Rodriguez), try unsuccessfully to convince the crowd that acting collectively for the greater good of all is essential for humanity's survival.

 

It is the dialogue that begins with Peter Seller’s appearance, playing a cult leader (sound familiar?) by the name of “Imperial Me” (sound familiar?) who gleefully whips up the rage of his followers to abandon all vestiges of civility and law (sound familiar?)

 

Here’s the part that can serve as a metaphor for Trump’s role in January 6:

 

IMPERIAL ME: Now, folks, the first item on today's agenda is this business of the people from down yonder and the people from across river wanting to come in here and talk about what they call our mutual problems, our common differences.

[ Crowd murmurs ]

Now, they want to talk, talk, talk, talk, talk about our problems. They want to debate, debate, debate about solutions until somehow they get their problems solved. They want to waste our time. They want us to commit ourselves to that kind of surrender.

[ Indistinct shouting ]

Unpatriotic!

They're...

They're insane.

Unpatriotic!

[ Shouting stops ]

Now, then. They don't come out in so many words and say that they want to take us over.

[ Chuckles ]

They're too clever for that..But that's what they want. They want to take over us individual me. And if we let them seep in here from down yonder and across river, if we let these do-gooders, these bleeding hearts propagate their insidious doctrine of involvement among us, then, my dear friends, my beloved mes, we'se in trouble...Deep, deep trouble.

[ Laughter ]

And because...Because we have now reached a pure state of civilization, the world of the ultimate me is finally within our grasp...This world where only the strong will exist, where only the powerful will love, where finally the word "we" will be stamped out and will become "I" forever. Because we are each the wise...We are each the strong...And we are each the individual mes!

[ All chanting "me!" ]

[ Chanting continues ]

CHARLES: Listen! Listen! No, listen!

CROWD: No!

CHARLES: Please!

CROWD:  No!

CHARLES: Listen! Listen to me!

[ Chanting continues ]

Please, let me speak!

[ Chanting stops ]

IMPERIAL ME: Let him speak.

CHARLES: To the best of our knowledge, we are all of humanity who remain alive, all that's left. Now, we have survived the Holocaust, and if we are to go on surviving, we must work together now. We must talk together.

[ Light laughter ]

And if other people want to join us, if they want to talk with us, we... we must listen to them.

[ Laughter ]

And we must respond to them. We must begin again. We must have law again and  ethics and honor and decency.

[ Laughter ]

These things were not destroyed by the bomb!

[ Laughter continues ]

This time, they must be made real! They must be made facts!  Only these things can guarantee our survival!

[ Laughter continues ]

The potential goodness of man.

[ Laughter continues ]

The potential morality of man.

[ Laughter continues ]

The capability... that's it! The capability of human beings to achieve dignity and decency. Together! Not "I" or "they," but "we." Don't you understand? The only alternative to that is nothing! Don't you see that, people?!  Don't you see?!

[ Laughter continues ]

[ Microphone bangs ]

IMPERIAL ME: That's enough. Bring him over here. Come. Bring him over here. You are charged with the treason of involvement. You are charged with the subversion of the individual me. How do you plead?

WOMAN: Guilty, guilty!

ALL: Guilty, guilty, guilty!

[ All shouting ]

[ Microphone bangs ]

[ Shouting stops ]

IMPERIAL ME: You anything to say? It's your right as an individual me, you know. Just say anything that comes in your head. You don't have to think about it. Just say it. Go ahead. Oh, you want to use the microphone?

CHARLES: I may be all the sanity that is left. I may be all the conscience that remains on earth. I can't let you kill me!

[ Laughter ]

 

The “treason of involvement and the subversion of the individual me,” chilling in every respect.  This was the America when Trump left office and we voted for a reprise.  The death of Jimmy Carter and the impending passing of the baton, again, to DJ Trump mark the laying to rest “we” and the reemergence of “me.”

 

It will be the 4^th anniversary of the January 6^th insurrection tomorrow.  Indeed, the American Flag should fly at half mast out of respect for Jimmy Carter, but as well for abolishing justice for the events of January 6, 2021. At least there will be poetic justice: it still will be at half mast inauguration day.

January 6, 2021, also a day which will live in infamy

 

Postmortem of the Postmortem or Welcome to ‘Moolah Lago’

 

The post election implications have been explained to death and besides my despondency I should have little to add.  But this blog has been more about my personal slant, so why stop now?

 

Talk about being a Pollyanna:  I had said to a friend immediately after the election that I was hoping to be surprised by a Trump 2.0.  Being the contrarian that he is (and that’s putting it mildly), he has an opportunity to rise like a phoenix from the ashes of his own dystopian landscape and surprise us all by putting together a government with some thread (slight though it may be) of normalcy, choosing notability over bottomless infamy.  I was trying to think out-of-the-box.  Instead, I was out-of-my-mind.  I guess hope never dies.

 

His appalling Cabinet selections of the inexperienced, hopeless conspiracy theorists and 2020 election and Jan. 6 deniers (with a few accused sexual predators thrown in) will cement his reputation as being the ultimate saboteur of normalcy.  The best summation is by David Remnick of ‘The New Yorker’ who notes the picks “is a trolling beyond mischief. All these appointees are meant to bolster Trump’s effort to lay waste to the officials and the institutions that he has come to despise or regard as threats to his power or person. These appointees are not intended to be his advisers. They are his shock troops. Or could it be that the President-elect is out to reduce the country to the status of a global laughingstock?”

 

There is so much election blame to go around but I’ll mention some that stick in my craw.  

 

Trump’s instincts to merge entertainment into the political landscape resulted in a lethal online gaslighting campaign.  After all, the former is what he instinctively understands.  The Democrats thought issues were more important than bizarre behavior and side show antics: how out of touch and antediluvian.

 

At his side was his fellow plutocrat, Elon Musk.  Together, and with the help of Musk’s social media firm Twitter (X), they effectively reached disenfranchised voters, mostly white but from all ethnicities, who choose the price of gasoline and the joys of trolling over the moral character of the Presidency.  Or, maybe more precise, choose lack of character as a middle finger to those they view as a libtard (essentially, anyone not a Trumpublican).  One has to wonder whether Musk’s overpaying for Twitter was all part of a larger game plan as he stands mightily to benefit from deregulation and his government contracts for SpaceX.   

 

And the Democrats’ progressive agenda was viewed negatively by average Americans.  How many times did we hear accusations that Harris supported government funded sex changes for prisoners, especially “dangerous undocumented immigrants?”  In our post-truth world just the inference with the appearance of truth will suffice.

 

 

 As usual, a picture is worth a thousand words, and this picture is a political cartoon which captures the essence of what happened.  We now have a full fledged plutocracy.  I love the new moniker for Trump’s residency, “Moolah Lago,” by Politico’s editorial cartoonist Matt Wuerker. His Politico profile says that he “lives in Washington, D.C., in close proximity to the National Zoo and the Swiss Embassy. Depending how bad things get, he hopes to find asylum in one or the other.”  Perhaps he is packing his bags as this political cartoon says it all about the nature of the election, how those who will not benefit were maneuvered to support a rule by the wealthy, or the crazy, or the corrupt, whatever. 

 

They croon lovingly and nostalgically about the time there were only tariffs and no income tax – the Gilded Age, controlled by the barons of big oil and the railroads.  The question now is how quickly the incoming administration, with its Wall Street / tech / crypto barons, morphs into a full blown autocracy.

 

Trump could have (no should have) been stopped not long after Jan 6, 2021.  But the Justice system moves glacially and the accident of Merrick Garland as an AG who is no ball buster was the final topping.  He would have made a good Supreme Court Justice; we have Mitch McConnell to thank for that not happening. 

 

I don’t pretend to know about the intricacies of the Justice system but I think it is fair to ask why after four years there was no accountability for Trump’s participation in the events of that day.  We all witnessed it with our own eyes.  Except for his slavish followers, we all know that he is more than in part responsible. 

 

At that time I wrote “Criminal, inciting sedition.  This by a sitting President.  Unthinkable.  Punishable, impeachable,” That event alone should have disqualified him from ever running for public office again.

 

Four years, a 2^nd failed impeachment, and multiple trials later, including being convicted of 34 counts of felonies in New York State, we have our mobster president back, older but wiser as to how to do end runs around the system and reward loyalty to him. 

 

Now he has all levers of government at his disposal, including his subservient Supreme Court.  Will a few Republican Senators and/or members of the House of Representatives not rubber stamp ALL White House proposed appointments and legislation?  Otherwise our last hope is the 4^th Estate, that Freedom of the Press will endure, and the nation can hang on until the midterm elections.

 

In 1956 Nikita Khrushchev said: “We will take America without firing a shot. We do not have to invade the U.S. We will destroy you from within”.

 

Indeed, the election results are starting to feel like a national suicide.

 

 

A High-Stakes Dilemma; the 2024 Election

 

It’s come to this: choose between an “only I can save you” candidate and an “only I can beat him” incumbent president.  It is a choice between two self-serving candidates, one who Christian evangelicals think was sent by God and one who says “only the Lord Almighty himself” can stop him from running.  Score: God 2, America 0.

 

Don’t we, the electorate, deserve better than this?

 

On the one hand we have the twice impeached Trump (both times acquitted by his Senate acolytes).  He is also subject to a ruling that he committed fraud (by NY State, Trump appealing the case), a hush money felony conviction (by the Manhattan D.A., sentencing delayed courtesy of SCOTUS) and a conviction as a defamer and a sexual abuser of E. Jean Carroll (cases now out on appeal).  Then there is the Department of Justice’s charge that he committed felonies removing White House documents to Mar-a-Lago (the Trump appointed Judge Aileen Cannon is indefinitely postponing the trial).  Add to this the indictment by Fulton County, GA of his participation in a conspiracy to commit Election Subversion (naturally, the case is not expected to begin before the November election).  And, finally, perhaps the most serious of all, the Department of Justice’s grand jury indictment of Trump for Election Subversion, his actions culminating in the Jan. 6, 2021 riot (?), insurrection (?) peaceful tourist exploration of the U.S. Capitol building (?) (please fill in one of the choices depending on your political persuasion).  This case is now knee-capped by the recent conservative leaning Supreme Court, three of whom were Trump appointed.  Those are the challenger’s credentials.

 

On the other hand, we have President Biden, whose old man shuffle looks very bad but, worse, shows signs of cognitive decline during his presidency culminating in his own suggestion of an early debate (“make my day, man”).  Sad. The President essentially is a good man, having moral values that we, who have lived long enough, have seen erode over our lifetimes.  Although politics has always been a rough and tumble arena, the old guardrails of acceptable social mores and civility are failing in an iPhone-social-media-consumed world where 240 characters and the Internet equivalent of chain letters pass as thinking.

 

He has, as his family and handlers insist, done many good things.  Bringing us back into the world of nations with some shred of respect might be among the most significant.  But Dr. Jill, his wife, is both right and wrong that a poor 90 minute performance should not erase the accomplishments of 3-1/2 years.  The legitimate concern is the next 4-1/2 years.  And beating the cult of Trump is not an easy task even for a younger, more vigorous candidate as the Electoral College, not the popular vote, decides such elections.  The next five months must be filled with intensive campaigning in those swing states.  This is going to be an election season which will be ground out, yard by yard. And as the Presidency goes, the makeup of the House and Senate could follow: high stakes, indeed.

 

That 90 minute debate presented so many opportunities for a more-in-the-moment candidate to simply respond to Trump’s avalanche of invectives, lies, non sequiturs, and his vision of an apocalyptic America. Just a “will you listen to what this man just said?” would have been sufficient.  It is a well known rhetorical device to overwhelm the opponent with so much garbage in a short period of time that it is impossible to respond to all.  But Biden failed to capitalize on those opportunities and robotically went onto his own bullet points, poorly presented, trailing off into mumbling, painfully allowing Trump, an expert in reality TV to use his logorrhea and body language to eviscerate Biden.

 

The point is, we all saw the so called “debate” and once seen it can’t be unseen.  The same point should be made about the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol.  We all saw Trump urging the crowd on, and, once seen, it can’t be explained away.

 

To make matters worse, on Friday July 5, Biden agreed to an interview with George Stephanopoulos on ABC.  Presumably this was supposed to show us the new and improved Joe.  It only brought out more issues.  Early on he was asked the pointed question: “Did you watch the debate afterwards?”  First he had that deer in the headlights look, until finally responding “I don’t think I did, no.” Oh, Joe, is the answer really “no” or you already don’t remember?  Most chilling though was his insistence that only God could make him drop out of the race, and then to the question of how he would react to losing to Trump he said: “I’ll feel as long as I gave it my all and I did the goodest [sic] job as I know I can do, that’s what this is about.” In other words, if we give it the ‘ole college try, that’s good enough?  In an election which may decide if the American experiment is over?

 

He frequently turns to his wife for advice but publicly she is proving not to be objective.  Given the high, high stakes, perhaps we need a much more forceful intervention by Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer.

 

To the repeated question of whether he would take a cognitive or neurological test, Biden implied every day was such a test (given his responsibilities), dodging the answer.  Both candidates should take two tests, a cognitive test and one to determine an Antisocial Personality Disorder.  Publish the results so, as Mitch McConnell infamously exclaimed blocking Merrick Garland’s SCOTUS nomination, “the American people can decide.”

 

Peggy Noonan accurately framed the Democratic Party’s dilemma in the July, 6/7 Wall Street Journal: “It makes no sense to say, ‘Joe Biden is likely going to lose so we should do nothing because doing something is unpredictable.’ Unpredictable is better than doomed.”

 

Exactly 248 years after the signing of the Declaration of Independence a new British Prime Minister was elected, Keir Starmer, who told Britons the following day “Country first, party second.”  Might it be time for both the Democratic and Republican parties to adopt the same priorities?