Before the election we heard Donald Trump say it over and
over again, “Folks, the election is rigged.”
His victory tour has been silent on the subject until recently when the
CIA “in a secret assessment” (I wonder how long they had been hanging on to
that) said that Russia was involved in the WikiLeaks email releases of the Democratic
National Committee (DNC), possibly to swing the election results in his favor. While the Trump campaign embraced the FBI’s
resumption of reviewing Clinton’s emails only eight days before the election
(clearing her once again only two days before), his Tweet response to the CIA’s
assertion was to discredit the Agency saying “these are the same people that said
Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction.”
Trump’s pre-election rally in Green Bay, Wisconsin on
Oct. 17 pretty much summarizes his stump speech about “a rigged election,” repeated
like an Anvil Chorus in other speeches: “Remember,
we’re competing in a rigged election. This is a rigged election folks, OK? The
media is an extension of the Clinton campaign as WikiLeaks has proven. And they don’t talk about WikiLeaks, they
just keep talking about Trump, Trump, Trump. They want to put nice, sexy
headlines up even though nothing has happened, nothing took place, even though
it’s a total fabrication. They even want to try rigging the election at the
voting booths, and believe me there’s a lot going on. Do you ever hear these people? They say ‘there’s nothing going on.’ People
who have died 10 years ago are still voting.
Illegal immigrants are voting. I mean, where are the street smarts of
some of these politicians?” Talk about
“fabrications.”
In spite of Trump’s claim that he won in a “landslide”
just that little bit of tailwind of the FBI’s bringing up the Clinton email affair
again right before the election, and WikiLeaks providing the DNC email may have
provided enough of a boost for Trump to marginally win these three swing
states: WI, MI, and PA. I’ve done some
number crunching on this. Clinton’s national victory margin of 2.6 million votes
or nearly 2% more than Trump became a hundred thousand total vote deficit in
those three states, less than a percent difference. Had those states gone to Clinton, she would
have won the electoral vote and she would be President. So much for Trump’s “landslide” victory but the
one truth he told was the election was rigged, although not the way he asserted,
thanks to Russia, WikiLeaks, and the FBI.
Steel, coal, and low-skilled manufacturing are not coming
back in those rust belt states like the 1950’s.
He knows it. He now reneges on
his words unabashedly, even admitting they were only said to get himself
elected, such as during his “victory tour” in Grand Rapids when the crowd was
jeering “lock her up” “he said: No, it’s ok. Forget it. That plays great before
the election. Now, we don’t care, right?”
Or “Buy America, Hire America” just another get-elected
slogan, his businesses routinely buying overseas and hiring less expensive foreign
labor. As our local December 8 Palm Beach
Post headline spelled out “Trump again hires non-U.S. club staff.” His Mar-a-Lago Club in Palm Beach routinely uses
the federal government’s H-2B visa program to hire foreign workers for the
season instead of domestic ones. Nothing
makes a difference in his celebrity revered, post-truth world.
A little more than a year ago I wrote
It Can’t Happen Here? [Emphasis on the question mark] One would think our democracy is immune to demagoguery
because our forefathers created a governmental structure of checks and
balances.
Alexander Hamilton even
adopted the safeguard of the Electoral College, a buffer of sorts, to ensure
our Presidents are “pre-eminent for ability and virtue.”
One could argue that if there was ever a time
when the Electors should reconsider an election, this is the one.
But that isn’t going to happen with Trump and
his 17,000,000 Twitter followers, possibly locked and loaded.
Electors who vote their conscience do so at
their own personal peril.
That is my fear over the next four years, the potential
to circumvent those checks and balances, including the traditional press, via social
networks and fake news.
As he said on
60 Minutes, “I have such power in terms
of numbers with Facebook, Twitter, Instagram etc,…[They] are great form[s]
of communication.”
He knows it and we better
watch out.
PS The evening after posting this article I read the
New York Times and discovered that Paul
Krugman wrote a very similar assessment, making some of the same points
(The Tainted Election).
Lest I
be accused of plagiarism, I wrote my first draft two days before, letting it
sit as I am prone to do with any political entry, and then editing and posting
it.
I have long admired Paul Krugman and
feel in good company that the facts drew us to similar conclusions!
